The Signal Diagnostics · AI in healthcare
An FDA panel backed the first multi-cancer blood test. Here's what the data actually show.
Advisers voted 7–2 that Galleri's benefits outweigh its risks. The FDA's own briefing shows a test that is very specific, finds about a third of cancers within a year, and raises questions nobody has answered yet.
Key takeaways
- On Sept 23, 2026, an FDA advisory panel voted 7–2 (one abstention) that the benefits of GRAIL's Galleri test outweigh its risks for adults 50 and older. The vote on effectiveness was closer: 6–4.
- In the PATHFINDER 2 study, Galleri detected 35.0% of cancers diagnosed within 12 months, with 99.85% specificity and a 77.0% positive predictive value.
- Detection was lower for early-stage disease: 21.4% of stage I cancers.
- The FDA hasn't decided yet and isn't bound by the panel. There is currently no FDA-authorized test for screening for multiple cancers.
On September 23, 2026, the FDA's Molecular and Clinical Genetics Devices Panel reviewed GRAIL's premarket approval application for Galleri, a blood test that looks for cancer-specific methylation patterns in cell-free DNA. The panel voted 7–2, with one abstention, that its benefits outweigh its risks; it supported safety unanimously and effectiveness 6–4, according to GRAIL.
If the FDA approves it, Galleri would be the first authorized test for screening for multiple types of cancer at once. The FDA's executive summary for the meeting states plainly that "there are currently no FDA-authorized devices indicated for the screening for multiple types of cancer."
What the test is for
As proposed, Galleri is intended to screen adults aged 50 or older for the early detection of multiple cancer types. A positive result ("Cancer Signal Detected") comes with a prediction of where in the body the signal likely originates. A negative result does not rule out cancer, and people are meant to keep up with recommended single-cancer screening such as colonoscopy and mammography.
What the numbers say
The FDA's briefing reports results from two pivotal studies. In PATHFINDER 2, with 12 months of follow-up:
- Sensitivity: 35.0% of cancers diagnosed within 12 months were flagged by the test (95% CI 29.8–40.5%).
- Specificity: 99.85%. The false-positive rate was 0.15%.
- Positive predictive value: 77.0%. About three in four people with a positive result were diagnosed with cancer within a year.
- Number needed to screen: 202 people tested per cancer detected.
- Where it came from: when the test was right, it predicted the cancer's origin correctly 94.3% of the time.
In the UK's NHS-Galleri trial, performance was similar: 31.6% sensitivity, 99.74% specificity and a 66.2% positive predictive value.
The early-stage question
The point of screening is to catch cancer early, when it's most treatable. PATHFINDER 2 found 21.4% of stage I cancers, 33.3% of stage II and 58.1% of stage III. The FDA asked the panel to weigh performance separately for cancers that already have recommended screening (breast, colorectal, lung, cervical, prostate) and those that don't — where a blood test could fill a real gap.
What is known
The test is highly specific, false positives are rare, and when it flags cancer it usually points to the right organ.
What is promising
It detects some cancers that have no routine screening today, from a single blood draw.
What is uncertain
Whether earlier detection prevents late-stage cancer or death. In NHS-Galleri's first screening round, stage IV incidence was 3% lower overall (13% for 12 deadly cancer types), but the confidence intervals crossed no effect and no formal test was run. The proposed indication makes no such claim.
What to watch for in marketing
The number of cancer types a test can signal describes breadth, not how often it finds them. At 35% sensitivity within a year, most cancers in PATHFINDER 2 were not flagged.
What happens next
The FDA is expected to decide on the application in the coming months, GRAIL says. Advisory votes are recommendations; the agency makes the final call. The test was granted Breakthrough Device designation in 2018, per the FDA briefing.
For Texas, where companies like Austin-based cell-free DNA lab operator Natera and San Antonio's bioAffinity Technologies work on molecular and early-detection diagnostics, the decision will help set expectations for how the FDA judges screening tests that look for many diseases at once.
Companies in this story
Sources
- FDA Executive Summary, Molecular and Clinical Genetics Devices Panel, Sept 23, 2026
- GRAIL press release on the advisory committee vote
Spotted an error? Request a correction. Disclosure: if a company named here is a client of our publisher, Pantheon Media, the story says so.
Get Future Health Weekly
You're subscribed. The next issue is on its way.